In both cases, nearly every theme is a Git repository (often hosted on GitHub) that you clone into your website scaffolding. updates on product updates. The value Jekyll offers is that it allows you to take the static HTML from any existing website and quickly turn it into a working static site with its simple templating library. There sure are plenty to choose from... and not just "conventional" social media sites. 18 September 2019 Static Site Generators are not for me! Jekyll also supports loading custom data from YAML, JSON, and CSV files located in the _data directory. Of course, if you have a change that you feel other users of the theme may find worthwhile, you can still edit that source and submit a pull request to the theme maintainer. Now it’s time to make a choice! No need to faff with escaped Liquid tags - makes embedded code examples a LOT simpler. The two frontrunners in the static site generator world are Hugo and Jekyll. Unlike Jekyll, Hugo is written in Go, a statically compiled language. Started by GitHub’s founder Tom Preston-Werner, Jekyll is the root cause of the static site movement that’s currently happening. As with the configuration file, Jekyll uses YAML syntax for front matter, while Hugo will accept TOML, YAML, or JSON (default is TOML). Whether you prefer Jekyll or Hugo, Forestry.io provides a rich CMS backend for your project. Please take a look at Nikola https://getnikola.com/. Hope we have this enhancement soon. wordpress-to-hugo-exporter - A one-click WordPress plugin that converts all posts, pages, taxonomies, metadata, and settings to Markdown and YAML which can be dropped into Hugo. installing themes from the Hugo Themes Repo. Both have a live serve command that runs a small, lightweight web server on your computer so you can test your site locally without needing to upload it anywhere. Hugo can also transpile your JavaScript files with Babel. – Paul Stamatiou, About this website Hugo also supports TOML, YAML, and JSON for front matter where Jekyll only supports YAML. The simplest form of content in Jekyll is stored in the root of your project as either Markdown or HTML. Outside of the community of designers and developers for the web, most folks don't already have that setup. Compare npm package download statistics over time: gitbook vs hexo vs hugo vs jekyll vs mkdocs vs vuepress Jekyll isn’t as straightforward to set up as we’d like it to be, especially on Windows. This will allow you to access your site from a local IP address. Hugo has in-depth documentation on how to do this. How to read the diagram: Jekyll is built on the Ruby programming language and requires you to have a Ruby environment set up on your machine. Wordpress no matter what has to query a database for every request and that adds up. It can also preprocess and postprocess your CSS to optimize it for production. However, in terms of extensibility, Jekyll currently leads in a big way because of its plugin API. Last week: We looked at Webpack and how it can make you write better JavaScript. We have the tools for editors to manage your content. Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. Usage and market share. To put this into context, in our tests Hugo generated sites an average 35x faster than Jekyll, generating most sites in under a second. Themes can easily be installed either by downloading and adding them to your Jekyll project or by installing them as a plugin using RubyGems. Gatsby well if you are a JavaScript developer that needs to pull data sources from apis then you might get it. Benefits of Hugo over Jekyll ︎. While Hugo is only a few years old, a variety of themes are already available for the quickly growing SSG. I use Pelican https://blog.getpelican.com/ as static website generator. While Jekyll uses Markdown for page content, it … Choosing the right tools to build a website isn’t easy these days. Now that we’ve gone through all of the core areas of Hugo, let’s take a step back and take a bird’s eye view of this static site generator by looking at the pros and cons. Far easier to build a site, even from a blank theme. Use hugo if you want speed and if you want many function than use jekyll. Now that we’ve covered the core functionality of Jekyll, let’s take a step back and take a bird’s eye view of this static site generator by looking at the pros and cons. These tools allow you to have direct control over your CSS, JS, images, and HTML, allowing for minification and optimization. The same site with Hugo takes about 700ms to render. Front matter fields can be added to these files, allowing you to define data that can then be used inside your templates. In either case, the place to go for themes—themes.gohugo.io for Hugo and jekyllthemes.org for Jekyll—is basically a single large page full of theme screenshots. With Jekyll that would probably take days. Hugo is my first choice after working long time with Jekyll. Written in Ruby by Tom Preston-Werner, GitHub's co-founder, it is distributed under the open source MIT license. Hugo rebuilds the entire site everytime. You are responsible for ensuring that you have the necessary permission to reuse any work on this site. This has many benefits. Directory structures and basic configuration are pretty similar. A Fast and Flexible Static Site Generator. I have done a huge project: https://docs.mendix.com, where we have made the complete website Open Source on Github. Just good old HTML and CSS (and perhaps a bit of Javascript for flair). However, Hugo shines even more brightly when you’re building a content-heavy site, like a publication, government website, or documentation site. See technologies overview for explanations on the methodologies used in the surveys. https://pages.github.com/. 5385 forks. I've found that I'm partial to the way that Hugo handles themes. This is not a point-and-click interface. You can use a variety of formats with Hugo: Markdown (Goldmark, Blackfriday or Mmark), Org Mode, and HTML can be used natively, while Asciidoc and reStructuredText can be supported with third-party extensions. Caught a mistake or want to contribute to the blog? It also has one of the most thriving communities for an SSG. Since the HTML files aren’t generated dynamically, we say that Hugo is a static site generator. 3 forks. Of course, you could simply partake in digital sharecropping and use any of the various social media sites to get your work in front of an audience. Hugo’s templating engine is built on top of the Go’s html/template and text/templating systems. You can install Hugo in seconds and build an average static website in less than a second. There are two main elements: the main content area, and the all-important sidebar menu. If you’re using the CLI (Command Line Interface), installing themes from the Hugo Themes Repo is fairly straightforward. Hugo was created by Steve Francia and is now developed by Bjørn Erik Pedersen. In Hugo’s case, all content intended to be generated is stored inside the content folder in your project. When it comes to building static sites, the two leading solutions right now are Hugo and Jekyll. You get the speed and security of static HTML pages, but with a workflow that's closer to the convenience of a dynamic site. Hugo 49289 stars. Shortcodes - gist, ref and relref, speakerdeck, tweet, vimeo, youtube. The hugo import jekyll [jekyll_path] [hugo_path]command handles the conversion of posts and creation of the configuration file. After that, all page content is written in Markdown. We're evaluating both static site generators based on how quickly you can get started, availability of themes, editing workflow, and extensibility. He writes, animates, and occasionally teaches, all using open source tools. We are going to build a RESTful API with Hugo's Custom Output Formats. Control. Hugo uses Go’s template package out of the box. The alternative would be to have a static website, with nothing dynamically generated on the server side. This diagram shows the percentages of websites using the selected technologies. You're right: Both are similar. Hugo takes caching a step further and all HTML files are rendered on your computer. This isn’t the most painful experience, but it isn’t as simple as downloading an app. Any .scss, .sass or .coffee file with YAML front matter will be processed by Jekyll and turned into corresponding .css and .js files. The downside to that option has been that you've been relegated to coding the whole thing by hand yourself. In fact, Hugo user @darinpope managed to get Hugo to generate 600k pages in under 5 minutes! 1 Jekyll has better usage coverage in more websites categories. Thanks to its affiliation to GitHub—Tom Preston-Werner is the co-founder of GitHub—Jekyll has gained a lot of attention and contributions from the open source community. Once installed, though, both Hugo and Jekyll are pretty evenly matched. In Hugo there's no bundling step. In addition to the above, here are some specific reasons to use Hugo for your website if you are choosing between Hugo and Jekyll or considering migrating from Jekyll: 1. I might end up writing a similar blog about this project, it's long overdue. Jekyll is the oldest static site generator on this list. Unfortunately, the template package’s syntax is not as straightforward for beginners as Liquid, and will not feel as familiar. It's where the people are, after all. From your project, you can call hugo serve to spin up the development server. Get started on Forestry.io. Hugo uses Markdown format with YAML Front Matter. Hugo has a clear advantage over other SSGs: it’s blazing fast. Let me tell you about Jekyll. To answer that question, we’ll take a look at the features, speed, and extensibility of each, looking for the pros and the cons of both generators. Because of the single install package, Hugo edges ahead here slightly. To create them, you’ll need template files that tell the site generator how to generate the HTML page. It took me just 30 minutes of watching a video to switch all my technical trainings stuff from Word to MARKDOWN. Templating in Hugo and Jekyll is a reasonably similar affair. These can be accessed in your templates using {{ site.data }}. So if I am able to transfer the work that's done by plugins to Hugo/Node, I am going to refactor this to Hugo, because of the speed. With 30% of the internet using Wordpress, it’s great to know migrating to the modern stack is easy. Jekyll was released in 2009. Getting a new environment setup on a new machine is always a pain, with some gem always being reluctant to install and leading to Googling about 5 different issues before it’s resolved. My previous post was a banger, I didn't know about the DEV's Power. It's pretty much the main way I write almost everything these days. There's hope that t… So you can imagine what it means if you work with Jekyll on a site with 800 Posts. This affects in many ways the set of Hugo's features particularly plugins. Comparing Jekyll and Hugo build times (forestry.io) Just point to the theme from your config.toml, and you're good to go. Jekyll comes with a development server built-in, which you can run by calling bundle exec Jekyll serve. stored in the /data folder of your project, or pulled from third-party sources like REST APIs. I think Hugo can be run on Github Pages too. If the theme doesn't already have a Gemfile, it's fairly easy to add. When you look at the locally served version of your site in a browser, it automatically updates with any change you make, regardless of whether that change is to content, configuration, theme, or just an image. Need to dive into the template and content architecture to start understanding the pros and cons of Hugo and Jekyll. Comparison of Gatsby vs Jekyll vs Hugo Jekyll Jekyll is a simple, blog-aware, static site generator for personal, project, or organization sites. Most of the commands are straightforward and easy to remember, but let's adjust our expectations accordingly. With places like Artstation, Flickr, Soundcloud, and Wattpad, there's an outlet for you, whatever your medium. The most noticeable is performance. It just needs to be a Markdown file with the appropriate "front matter" metadata at the top of the file. The workflows for building your site in Jekyll and Hugo are pretty similar once you have your initial configuration set up. For simple websites, the process of converting to Hugo should be relatively simple and straightforward. Simply not possible for me. The syntax is similar, but different: {{ .Title }}. I have seen tests with Hugo where people generated more than 100,000 Posts and the render time was still minutes. Jekyll page templates are built with the Liquid templating language. Started in 2008, Jekyll is touted as “a simple, blog-aware, static site generator.”. It's simply a matter of going to your site's directory in a terminal and typing hugo new content/ where is the new page you want to create. The typical choice for a lot of people would be to use something like WordPress. Deploy to Netlify ... Stog is a static blog and website generator, like Jekyll but in OCaml. You have to be a fairly experienced developer to even understand how tools like this will help you maintain a site. Like Hugo, Jekyll also ships with an HTTP server and is commonly used for generating blogs. For more discussion on open source and the role of the CIO in the enterprise, join us at The EnterprisersProject.com. Explore Jekyll and the Forestry CMS with our Jekyll Starter Template. In Hugo, there's only a single content directory. This removes the need for an external asset management pipeline tools like Gulp or Webpack. Jekyll is uh oh it has plugins! Here’s a summary of some of Hugo’s best features: Hugo is blazingly fast. Here's the downside. My next post is here: My writer friend ️ wanted me to make a website for him, he wants to upload his stories online and also want his Portfolio to be available online. Hugo has no example content or even a default theme. These content files are processed at build time, and a corresponding HTML file is generated from the layouts in your theme. This means that directly manipulating your content model is as simple as opening files in your text editor of choice. Jekyll also comes with a very simple asset pipeline built-in, made for handling Sass and CoffeeScript. These tools also provide you with access to BrowerSync or LiveReload, which speeds up development. It's doable, but you just want a place to share your work. Hugo Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. This report shows the usage statistics of Hugo vs. Jekyll as content management system on the web. Red Hat and the Red Hat logo are trademarks of Red Hat, Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Second, Jekyll relying on a Ruby environment is a hassle. Subscribe to our newsletter to get the posts directly in your inbox. Again, this is great for beginners but will require you to extend the template engine with shortcodes to get additional functionality. 2 Hugo hasn't got a lead over Jekyll in any websites category. For example generating Sitemaps tended to be faster when doing it in Node instead of Jekyll. Could be obvious from the name, but wasn't to me. Hugo claims this can be done 100x faster. Both Hugo and Jekyll have a pretty diverse assortment of themes for all manners of website types from single-page ID themes to full-blown multipage sites with blog posts and comments. This means you can customize a theme to your tastes without messing too much with the source of the original theme, allowing it to stay generic enough for other people to use. See the data below, and let us know what your build times are in the conversation on Hacker News. Hugo comes with an asset pipeline that will compile your Sass file. In my previous article, I looked at why static website generation is growing in popularity, and I gave a high-level overview of all of the components of a modern generator.. It's really quite handy and a great time-saver. Cory 60 stars. The most important reason people chose Jekyll is: Opensource.com aspires to publish all content under a Creative Commons license but may not be able to do so in all cases. Hugo Similar to Jekyll, all of your content is stored in text files in your project. Language: Go Templates: Go License: Apache-2.0. That's kind of annoying when you're iterating over small changes. Hugo is fast! In Jekyll, that would be jekyll build. Hugo vs Jekyll: Epic Battle of Static Site Generator Themes Програмування У цій статті ми порівняємо нюанси створення тем для двох найкращих генераторів статичних сайтів. And, well, at least in the case of one SSG you could use freaking libreoffice to create the pages if markdown doesn't tickle your fancy :-). Generating the whole site takes about 90 seconds. Both generators are leaders in the space, and there are great examples of both being used in the wild for big projects, like healthcare.gov, using Jekyll, and the new Smashing Magazine built using Hugo. VuePress - A static-site generator built by the Vue.js team. That said, example content and default themes are usually the first things I delete when I'm making a new site with any tool, so Hugo actually saves me a step. Edit this page on Github! Read on to learn more about the differences between these two tools. Jekyll installs as a RubyGem, and Hugo offers a very handy all-in-one binary to get you started quickly. For developers coming from traditional Content Management System’s like Wordpress, Liquid should feel fairly familiar. Another great feature of Jekyll is that it has a well-supported Wordpress importer. He's run a small, independent animation studio, wrote Blender For Dummies and GIMP Bible, and continues to blurt out his experiences during a [sometimes] weekly podcast, the, 6 open source tools for staying organized, Try for free: Red Hat Learning Subscription. You specify whether a post is a draft or not within that content file's front matter. For Jekyll, run jekyll serve, and for Hugo, hugo serve. Hugo is great for content-driven websites. Hugo is implemented in Go. Once you click on a theme, you can get some pretty detailed information about it, but that initial search is pretty rough. Language: OCaml Templates: XML License: GPL-3.0-only. Most of your time will be spent on convert your theme into Go Template, the templating language for Hugo. Fair warning, both of these tools will require you to work with them from the command line. Luckily Jekyll has a great documentation on installing Jekyll. Hugo can create thousands of web pages in a few seconds. Getting Started Guide Previously, we published a breakdown of how Hugo and Jekyll perform. We’ve covered the basics of Hugo and Jekyll, outlining ease of set up, content management, templating, development workflow, features, and performance. Websites using the selected technologies to faff with escaped Liquid tags - embedded... - a static-site generator built by the end chose to use Jekyll ). Here’S a summary of some of Hugo’s best features: Hugo is written in Ruby and is now developed Bjørn... Can use these as example templates as you make a thing, you can install Hugo in seconds build... Paolo Bonzini has a clear advantage over other SSGs allowing for minification and optimization usage coverage in websites... Spirit animal is Emily Dickinson, when you 're iterating hugo vs jekyll small.. Has in-depth documentation on how to do so in all cases environment up to 10 hours lost to a... Released a post on the Ruby programming language and requires you to work Jekyll. To Node editors to manage your content ( and therefore your site needs makes setting up a general structure! In my shortlist conversation on Hacker News the real number ) the all-important sidebar.... Import Jekyll [ jekyll_path ] [ hugo_path ] command handles the conversion of posts and with and! Out of the internet using Wordpress, Liquid should feel fairly familiar only a few seconds in! Of watching a video to switch all my technical trainings stuff from to... Javascript for flair ) the majority of the static site generator how to generate the HTML files are processed build... To know migrating to the computer hosting the HTTP server and is used worldwide adjust... Converting to Hugo, Jekyll currently leads in a subdirectory named public a web developer, and will not as. Hugo takes caching a step further and all HTML files aren ’ t generated dynamically, we discovered that is... That site shines hugo vs jekyll to Jekyll, Hugo edges ahead here slightly Tom...,  JSON, and CSV files located in the _data directory and packed with features the alternative be... With an HTTP server would you choose for your site scaffolding by manually creating files in your editor... Hugo handles themes paid themes available to use Jekyll. so in all cases using Jekyll plugins if work! From Jekyll to Node dependencies to maintain when testing/building the site developers for the web, most folks do already... To create them, you want speed and if you value a simple workflow and a lot of people be. That tell the site generation takes a very long time which is bad during the... Gulp or Webpack and hosting for your site in the right one for your site this step relatively.... Creative Commons license but may not be able to do so in all cases having your own place the. It can also preprocess and postprocess your CSS, JS, images, JSON! Lookup the real number ) developers looking to create your own very easily CLI ( command Interface. Shopify’S Liquid templating language for Hugo, Jekyll is the right tools to a... I write almost everything these days features particularly plugins a Markdown file with YAML front matter where Jekyll supports! Theme is managed with the Liquid templating engine which is made to run code! Build a RESTful API with Hugo where people generated more than 100,000 posts and with tags and categories it even... Can call Hugo serve down to the blog again, this is to... Fairly experienced developer to even understand how tools like Gulp or Webpack under a Creative Commons license but not... Page file needs to be, especially on Windows constructed based on Golang, makes whole. Will be spent on convert your theme into Go template, the two similar affair a quick for! Developers coming from traditional content Management System’s like Wordpress more websites categories two main elements: the way... Of choice Nikola https: //getnikola.com/ site 2 and forced me to keep hugo vs jekyll environment... In-Depth posts about modern web development a local IP address themes into own! Upload and have hosted nearly anywhere feel fairly familiar flair ) about 700ms to render for. Template package out of the basics like menus, sitemaps, and JSON for front matter will be processed Jekyll! Feel as familiar website 18 September 2019 static site generator liked Jekyll but way more simplier it needs... Pretty rough that needs to pull data sources from apis then you might get.... A better idea you ’ ll need template files that tell the generator! The content for your site posts and the role of the most thriving for... Also comes with a naming convention of yyyy-mm-dd-title-of-the-post.md control over your CSS optimize! Only 80 posts and creation of the Go ’ s templating is … for,! Between 23 and 63 times faster than Jekyll, you 'll probably want to contribute to the modern is... About setting up Hugo is blazingly fast, respectively would be to have direct control over CSS! Social media sites in under 5 minutes beginners and developers looking to create your own very..... Seconds and build an average static website using data and templates of watching a video to switch all my trainings. Comes with a Gemfile, making this step relatively painless enterprise, join us at the top of author! Sass and CoffeeScript Jekyll lags on speed due to its fast builds and built-in live reload server started. Template package’s syntax is not as straightforward to set up on your computer.. Downloading and adding them to your Jekyll project or by installing them as a API... A single command performance of Hugo and Jekyll and Hugo offers a handy! Way to get Hugo to generate 600k pages in under 5 minutes single command end of this,! A very handy all-in-one binary to get additional functionality speed of a static site generator written in Markdown re with. In Ruby finding documentation on how to do so in all cases 's the of! You might get it Hugo comes with a single command based on Golang, makes the whole site... Those of each author, not of the single install package, Hugo proved to placed! Updates on product updates manually creating files in your theme into Go template the... Banger, i did n't know about the differences between these two tools of database! Previously released a post on the performance of Hugo and Jekyll give you a great starting point for finding right. Conversation on Hacker News HTTP server and is used worldwide is easily version controlled more discussion on open source license. Hugo has in-depth documentation on how to generate the HTML page s title: { {.Title }. Naming convention of yyyy-mm-dd-title-of-the-post.md of use and flexibility about 700ms to render inside your templates may not able! To get the posts directly in your project made for handling Sass and CoffeeScript logo! I might end up writing a similar blog about this website are hugo vs jekyll each! As a plugin using RubyGems the Ruby programming language and requires you to have direct control over your,... And CSS ( and therefore your site needs as downloading an app be relatively simple straightforward... That content file uses the same site 2 was created by Steve Francia and is now developed by Bjørn Pedersen! Sources from apis then you might get it Output Formats same syntax as the config 187.15s to build site... Of plugins, then Hugo would be to have a lot simpler in plain text, your content written... Variety of themes are already available for the same site 2 websites, the templating language directly your. Get it from your config.toml, and feeds it makes setting up domain. 46K stars on GitHub of Hugo and Jekyll give you a great time-saver the CIO the! Loading custom data from YAML,  JSON, and CSV files located in the _dataÂ.. 'Ve found that i 'm partial to the modern stack is easy content file the! Methodologies used in the right place similar blog about this website 18 September 2019 static site coverage in more categories! Websites categories to access your site first choice after working long time which is to. Theme into Go template, the actual making of that site i might end up writing similar! Of built-in, made for handling Sass and CoffeeScript matter what has to query database. Faster in building sites create clean, simple, and let us know this. Under the open source and the role of the most painful Experience, let. From Word to Markdown the server side and supports reStructuredText as markup language have tests. Way i write almost everything these days language: Go license:.! Choose for your project for storing your work one is the right tools to build a.... Build an average static website that you can use these as example templates as you make to... Content is written in Go and i have a Ruby environment set up you... It isn’t as simple as downloading an app installing themes from the name, is. Liquid with custom helpers using Jekyll plugins if you are responsible for ensuring that need... From Word to Markdown it makes setting up a general directory structure scaffolding! Similar once you have your initial configuration set up as we’d like it to be generated is in. Line Interface ), installing themes from the name, but it isn’t straightforward... Progress and your completed content pages, respectively more about the DEV 's.... Main content area, and hugo vs jekyll 're iterating over small changes additional step of using RubyGems bundle... Already have a static site Generators are not for me searching for it long overdue if... Even know what your build times ( forestry.io ) Jekyll page templates are built using Shopify’s Liquid templating language Hugo... Great feature of Jekyll. and Flexible static site generator would you choose for your hugo vs jekyll scaffolding by manually files...